• Skip to content
  • Skip to footer

Q4IT

Quality Matters

  • Courses
    • DCMM Courses
      • AI in IT management
      • DCMM Masterclass
      • DCMM Professional
      • DCMM Manager
      • DCMM Expert
      • Digital IT Strategy
      • Innovation management in IT
      • Digital Transformation for CIO
      • Information Theory For IT Practioners
    • IT Quality Index Courses      >>>
      • IT Quality Foundation
      • IT Quality Expert
      • IT Quality Manager
      • Knowledge Worker Quality
      • Certification in IT quality
      • Managing supplier quality
      • IT performance reporting
    • Strategic CIO certification
    • AI, Innovation and Digital Transformation
    • Catalogue
    • Successful Candidate Register
    • On-Line free webinars
  • Consultancy
  • IT Quality Index
  • DCMM
    • DCMM graphics
    • DCMM – Insight
    • DCMM free resources
  • SFIA
  • Meetup CIO25
    • Conference program
    • Registration
    • Partnership CIO 25
  • Blog
  • Photo
  • About us
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Partnering with us
    • General Terms and Conditions
    • Personal Data Protection
  • Language: English
    • Čeština Čeština
    • English English

Zdenek Kvapil

Paradigms and IT management models – part 1/3 context ITSM

Zdenek Kvapil / 19.10.2018

Paradigms and IT management models – part 1/3 context ITSM

“What you see is all there is” – this is a biased perception of the world surrounding us, as pointed out by Daniel Kahneman in his brilliant book “Thinking, fast and slow”. Let’s explore this bias as and its implications on the world of IT governance models and frameworks.

Roots of ITSM are in 90’s when authors, dominantly coming from the world of external service providers collated a body of knowledge driven by service economy principles. Taking inspirations from airlines, telecoms and banks, and a new paradigm was created for that time, represented by the belief “every IT organization should act as a service provider”. Every IT department should create a service catalogue, define SLA’s, define charging models and start managing with an “us” (service provider) and “them” (user, customer) logic. Airlines are here to generate profit over customers, so service management practices developed for external service providers makes a lot of sense as there is an economic transaction, having a single point of contact make perfect sense for the traveller as they need to know where to send inquiries. Any interaction with the customer needs to be recorded to preserve evidence for billing and resolve potential disputes between the client and service provider.

This logic works well for IT organizations which act also as a service centre i.e. shared IT service centres, or fully outsources IT, when IT is a separated legal entity, selling its services to its mother organization or to other companies.

But when we apply this logic to internal IT departments, we see major toxicities:

  • IT is separating themselves from their colleagues behind SPOC, service catalogue, SLA’s and reports.
  • Resource consumption for administration is increased as additional bureaucracy is created and this increased bureaucracy is not measured.
  • IT starts to be seen as costs saving department where efficiency is prioritized over innovations.
  • Collaboration stalls.
  • Digital transformation is becoming the agenda for anyone but IT which presented themselves as a service provider.

Next part 2/3 is here

Follow Q4IT on Linkedin or @Q4IT_eu on twitter for the next part of this exploration to be posted soon.

« Previous Page

Footer

Q4IT Czech Republic

Q4IT Great Britain

Q4IT Canada

© 2025 Q4IT. All Rights Reserved.

Q4IT logo is a registered mark of Q4IT limited. All rights reserved.

Contact

General terms and conditions

Personal data protection

Copyright © 2025 · Digital Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube